Note: This essay contains critical references to and some descriptions content in fanworks that is/seen as objectionable including underage characters and sexualized/eroticized racism.

Fic-As-Lit Header (2)

I spent a lot of my time in graduate school arguing that “literature” as a word could encompass entire worlds of media that were consistently dismissed as not being sacred or classical enough.

I found the potential for literature in pretty much everything that had text in it and made a point of challenging the expectations that my classmates had about lit on a regular basis.

So I get that urge to be like “fan fiction should be as valued and as valid as literature” and I even embrace it – up to a point.

And that point comes when you look at the differences between how literature and fanfiction are critiqued. Or rather – how we’re allowed to engage critically with them.

Most people balk at the idea of people being critical of the fan fiction they read or the content that fandom comes out with. No matter how it’s put together, it’s directly opposite fandom’s goals and the experience of fandom to be critical of it in any way.

Meanwhile, people get entire degrees and have whole careers based on literary criticism.

Because taking literature at face value is just something that seems shallow.

But it’s expected of fandom and fan fiction.

And again, I do get it: because fan fiction isn’t mainstream media, we’re told that it impacts a smaller audience than the stuff we see on TV. And applying critical concepts to what we’re told is a tiny audience feels like punching down, right?

Except –

There are stories on the AO3 with hundreds of thousands of hits. (There are two stories that I can recall seeing with over a million.)

The most popular stories in a given fandom tend to have tens of thousands of hits and can have readers in the low five digits. Because of how the internet works and who has access to a site like the AO3, more people than ever are reading fanfiction for a massive variety of fandoms. Millions of people read fan fiction these days and it impacts a very real portion of the population of people who read.

Fanfiction isn’t the red-headed stepchild of the internet at this point in time.

But too many fans sure do want to pretend that it is.

With the Hugo Award win for the AO3, fandom is back to pretending that they want fan fiction to viewed as literature and legitimized in the eyes of the wider public. I don’t doubt that many people want fic to be legitimized because of how folks will mock it like it’s not formative for many of us, but let’s be very real here: they don’t want it to be taken as seriously as literature actually and largely is.

They want celebratory works focusing on how empowering fanfiction is for some queer people and some women – not articles unpacking the problematic aspects of what’s popular in these spaces. They want awards for authors and recognition of their work – but not conversations about how many of these authors can and do replicate harmful tropes in their work.

The critical conversations we manage to have about de Sade and Anais Nin despite their fans and value to someone’s literary canon, about transgressive and downright problematic authors – many of whom have written content that wouldn’t be out of place on AO3 once properly tagged – are not conversations we’re actually allowed to have about fic writers or the content they create.

And that’s just within fandom.

Anyone that writes a piece on fandom that appears to be coming from outside of fandom – and conveniently, all critique of fandom’s content or behavior is assumed to be coming from outsiders or newbies – is quickly shouted down or written off as being in “bad faith”.

The few pieces of content critical of fandom before and after the AO3’s Hugo Award win have been written off or ignored as coming from awful misogynists that hate women exploring their sacred sexuality. The people who’ve talked about how this win will be used to silence critique of fandom (like Dr. Rukmini Pande and myself) were absolutely treated like a threat to fandom instead of as people asking for folks to think just a little bit about what they’re asking to see legitimized.

And let’s be clear here: “if it got an award like this, how can it be a problem/problematic” is not an argument you want to make in a world where multiple genuinely awful humans – sex pests, racists, abusers, and the like – have been nominated for and have won multiple Hugo Awards.

Because awards don’t always have a ton to do with talent and in the case of the science fiction and fantasy community – and its fandom spaces – a lot of what goes into something getting an award is the value its fans give it. Not the value it actually has a well-written/crafted thing.

Award shows are mainly popularity contests and you can tell that in the science fiction and fandom communities – as with fandom – by who gets nominated for awards and who wins them.

The other thing I don’t believe that people understand is that even those Hugo-Winning Authors – or authors that’ve won another award – for their potentially problematic content still get criticized for their work. Being considered literature involves literary criticism but on top of that, all media gets reviews of some sort.

Winning an award doesn’t remove the responsibility to your audience.

Being nominated for an award doesn’t mean that your work is suddenly somehow above reproach.

And I don’t think that folks who are simultaneously anti-critique-of-fandom and desperate for fandom to be legitimized in the same vein that literature have realized two things:

  • That fan fiction is already not above critique from folks questioning the reliance on certain tropes, themes, and ship dynamics across the fan fiction we create and celebrate. All the claims that critique of fandom is inherently “in bad faith” because women are participating (and apparently… not critiquing it??) won’t stop that.
  • If fan fiction enters more firmly into the mainstream as a new(er) form of literature, more people will criticize potentially and actually problematic things that are normalized and reconstructed within fandom. We’ve already seen how intensely the critique has formed around fan fiction that’s had the serial numbers filed off of it and was subsequently published as original fiction.

If fan fiction is going to get the validity and legitimization of literature, the way we talk about it – the way we should’ve been talking about it – will change to encompass more avenues for criticism. Just saying…

During “Banned Books Week” this year, I saw a Tumblr post that used the week and several classic books to make a point about problematic fiction and the “need” for the Archive of the Own – and for the Archive to then host problematic content that no one can ever be vaguely critical about.

This post, on tumblr, has almost four thousand notes and probably has been seen by thousands more people who chose not to engage with it for some reason or another.

It’s also at least half-wrong in its approach. (I’m being generous here.)

Starting with its opening question:

What do we lose when we condemn the existence of fanworks that include unhealthy, traumatic, violent, or otherwise difficult material?

Folks in transformative fandom have a really weird time of things because some people really want fic to be taken as seriously as literature supposedly is, but they don’t want fic to be critiqued the way that literature is. Not content-wise, not on style.

Fic should be respected like lit but not treated like lit.

And let’s talk about how that “otherwise difficult” hides a lot of content that I think most people would find iffy because well… it is. It’s not difficult content. It’s disturbing content. It’s content that eroticizes experiences that really shouldn’t be turned into spank bank fodder. Using vague terms to get out defining what people are talking about is a smokescreen to hide what the OP is actually talking about.

And like… I’ve seen a ton of truly horrific stories hosted on the AO3 over my time using the archive as a reader and a writer that’d fall under “otherwise difficult”. Here’s a small sampling:

  • An original story where an enslaved Black child has an erotic encounter with his enslavers
  • Multiple stories where Vivienne from Dragon Age Inquisition is assaulted and tortured to appeal to an audience that wants to see her put in her place
  • A story where Steve Rogers has a fetish for Black men and fucks his way through the Black men in the comics
  • A story where T’challa is a slave in the US South and Tony Stark rescues him
  • Lots of stories where the men of Supernatural are de-aged dramatically and written into erotic encounters with their family members (also at least three flat out animal-boning stories)
  • Thousands of stories where sexual violence against children is actually eroticized (and, the majority of that tends to be written by adults who think it’s hot)

It’s content like this that the OP is really just unwilling to acknowledge by brushing stuff away as “difficult”. It’s content like this that makes up what a rising number of folks in fandom are refusing to accept as the norm in fandom.

The OP of the post uses four books as their examples, framing them as stories on the archive in order to make their point. I’m going to go over just the first one really quickly and talk about the problems behind literally reducing classical fiction down to AO3 tag and story structures to be like “hey, antis wouldn’t want us to read this” is beyond disingenuous.

Alice Walker’s The Color Purple:

This book-as-fic is rated E for Explicit and has Archive tags for Graphic Depictions of Violence, Rape/Non-Con, and Underage. It also is tagged with Sexual Abuse, Incest, Racism, queer sexuality, domestic Violence, Teen Pregnancy, Infidelity, and Explicit Language.

The summary that the OP used for this is as follows:

A young girl, Celie, writes letters to God documenting the hardships she experiences as a black woman in the American South, and the hard-fought love she ultimately finds from friends and family.

If you’ve ever read The Color Purple, you can probably see how reductive this summary and tag collection are. To make a point that The Color Purple would’ve been booted from The Archive As Antis Want It – which is again the underlying point across this piece, that there’s a fear of censorship from antis (of what I ask again, be specific about the content they’re against or shut up) – by squashing a deeply nuanced plot about queer Black womanhood into smug AO3 story display.

The racism that is in The Color Purple is far different from the racism present in a large number of fanworks – casual, unchecked, often eroticized, aimed at white people with mutation or superpowers, and full of tacit or explicit approval from the author.

The racism “tagged” for The Color Purple is not the racism present in stories where Black characters are demonized by non-Black creators for a non-Black audience. It’s not the racism present in decentering Black characters in order to focus on white ones. Walker wasn’t playing with an objectifying view of Black bodies as unworthy of love while hypersexual and always ready to top some non-Black bottom into incoherence.

Same goes for the sexual violence. Unlike much of the content tagged “Rape/Non-Con” on the Archive, the sexual violence in The Color Purple isn’t wielded irresponsibly. It’s not meant to shock or to get someone off. It’s not a kink. It is distressing and a reality portrayed as such. It’s not meant to appeal to someone’s id.

There’s an idea that because libraries have problematic content sans trigger warnings, fandom having problematic content with trigger warnings makes everything better.

That because “real authors” get away with brutalities on the page, so should fic writers because they’re supposedly targeting and reaching a smaller audience.

The OP here is making a point to diminish and kind of… muddy what The Color Purple is actually about in order to claim that because it was banned (because of racism, for sexual violence, for queer sexuality) from schools and libraries at a point, it’s content that’d fit on the Archive but also be removed if “antis” had their way.

But that’s not how any of that works.

Anyway –

Right now, on Twitter, there’s a ton of conversation about “purity culture” and what content should be allowed in fandom following some outcry about an author’s NSFW Homestuck fan fiction from 2013 – the characters in Homestuck are all children, apparently.

I’ve seen accounts make sweeping statements about how all fan fiction is okay and shouldn’t be criticized on any level for the content because it’s a form of media created by marginalized women first and foremost. Of course, I disagree with all of that –


But what I find fascinating is that a lot of this commentary is coming from published authors, some of whom that write for teenagers via the Young Adult genre. We’re talking about people who literally know the impact fiction has on other people and are paid to create work that impacts other people. Young people.

And yet I’ve seen multiple authors I know of that are basically saying that well actually… fiction somehow doesn’t mean anything or impact anyone and content exists outside of its contexts. Wild weirdness coming from people who make a living from impacting people with their words and worlds, I know.

Fan fiction is more visible now than it has been at any previous point in fandom’s history, I think. People teach courses about it and have their students write it for assignments. Multiple films are based on romance novels that are basically fic with the serial numbers filed off.

So why is it so hard for folks to accept that with legitimacy comes… a lot of stuff. Like personal responsibility and the understanding that folks will criticize us for problematic content we’ve created.


6 thoughts on “Fic-as-Lit

  1. this article was linked to me after talking about your (EXCELLENT) reylo one with friends… as someone who was heavily involved in that ‘anti’ discourse (and esp the hs one), this is such an eloquent, succinct, and just overall well put way of phrasing all the “well that doesn’t sound right”s that always come up in these discussions. thank you for both articles!


  2. For all that the details are different, this sounds a LOT like the dynamic at play in “are videogames art” arguments — people wanting what they’re enthusiastic about to be respected, but not to have to do any self-reflection about it.


  3. Very interesting article that raises some interesting questions. My own thoughts on the matter are mostly that…I don’t think it should be illegal to write any kind of fiction, even kinds of fiction I hate [and I have seen people claiming that it should–and I think it’s also somewhat hypocritical as I’ve seen some self-proclaimed anarchists who want to abolish prisons and police saying “anyone who wrote this ship should be imprisoned for life”–not that I think you are like that at all, just to be clear], even gratuitous shock value stuff that I don’t see much value in (if we’re not going to ban de Sade–and I don’t think we should–then why ban fanfic of a similar type?). And it isn’t currently illegal, at least under US and UK law.
    I also think no-one should be sent death threats or harassment over what they write. (And I’ve seen some truly horrific things including sucide bait and intrusive questions about what kind of sexual activity the author takes part in IRL, sent to people who weren’t even glorifying anything that shouldn’t be glorified in their stories, by people who admitted to not having read past the tags.)
    BUT no-one is immune to criticism. If someone writes, say, a story where their hundreds-of-years-old male protagonist stalks an underage teenage girl and watches her while she sleeps and this is portrayed as romantic…just as a hypothetical example…the book shouldn’t be banned (though it should have TWs for stalking and abuse and ideally parents should discuss it properly with their kids if their kids read it!) but people are free to talk/write blog posts/etc about all the deeply questionable tropes and glorification of unhealthy relationships in it. And I think people are just as free to do that about fic (though I probably wouldn’t bother if I encountered a single fic with not many kudos/hits that did that–but if it was becoming a major, unquestioned pattern in the fandom? I absolutely would.) It’s why I love your blog–because you criticise stories, tropes, and patterns, without ever going into “so if you read this and enjoyed it, you deserve to die!”–and it’s the kind of approach I attempt to take myself.
    Criticising something isn’t inherently the same thing as censoring it or banning people from enjoying it. I will criticise 50 Shades Of Grey at every possible opportunity because I hate it, it doesn’t mean I think everyone who’s ever read it is a disgusting monster (though I might worry about them…) and it certainly doesn’t mean I want the author to be arrested. I think some people miss that and think any criticism of a thing they like is a personal attack on them. (Though considering I’ve come across plenty of people online who DO resort to personal attacks at the slightest thing I can see why some people expect the worst.)
    Unfortunately there are also some people who genuinely think that writing about a topic at all is inherently bad, rather than simply glorifying it. I’ve seen people unironically say “the only reason anyone would ever have a rape occur in their story is a misogynistic desire to rape women” and similar. I think the idea that some topics can never be written about at all is a dangerous one, that silences survivors trying to tell their own stories–and writers who aren’t survivors but are genuinely doing their best to write well about a certain experience, for that matter. But at the same time, writers have a responsibilty to represent marginalised groups respectfully, and to be aware when a character’s actions are wrong/a relationship is unhealthy (someone writing a story about a 15 year old and a 25 year old in a sexual situation tagged with “grooming”, “abuse”, “unhealthy relationships” and “trauma” won’t get a second glance from me, though I recognise that different people might have different opinions about how well they’ve represented the effects of the trauma…but someone tagging a story with that kind of situation “romance” “cute” “fluff and smut” “lighthearted” is a major yikes). It’s a difficult balance, but I think the approach you take to analysis, criticism, and education is a very good one.


    • Genuinely, thank you for your very nuanced comment. You unpack literally everything I couldn’t quite get at with this and while I’m not 100% with you I’m 90% of the way there and I think that where you’re at is where more people across fandom should be in terms of understanding and unpacking what the issues are and should be with content creation and criticism. Additionally I agree that no fiction should be illegal out and out and that asking or demanding for it to be (and for the creators to be jailed or prosecuted) is decidedly WRONG. There are conversations that can be had about not making room for offensive content (like you pointed out with marginalized characters/people being written in harmful ways) that can happen WITHOUT throwing survivors or marginalized people working out/on their trauma out of the spaces they have. I don’t know that we’re there yet (even me, I’m still trying to be my best and fairest self and it’s HARD) but I hope that one day we’ll be able to have conversations as nuanced and as level as your comment is.


Comments are closed.